Thanks to advocates in Agile community, many software developers have gotten proficient at delivery. Perhaps now it is time to examine
what we're delivering.
Better questions and attentive listening might avert those occasions where we do an outstanding job of delivering the wrong thing.
Discovery & Delivery
At last week's last week's
CodeFreeze 2010 on the University of Minnesota campus (my alma mater), speakers
David Hussman and
Jeff Patton were wearing t-shirts that said
Discovery & Delivery.
The authorized theme of
CodeFreeze was
Redesigning Agility. The unauthorized theme might well have been as David and Jeff's t-shirts said -- Discovery & Delivery.
How do we integrate Interaction Design into our Agile projects?
Looking retrospectively beneath the vaulted glass and wood ceilings of
Memorial Hall, where
CodeFreeze was hosted, one might conclude that the Agile community deserves kudos for improving our ability to deliver software. One also might conclude that we have yet to make significant progress integrating interaction design and usability into the Agile cookbook.
Interaction design and usability considerations will continue to play a significant role in whether people are satisfied using our products. We had better jump on the design band-wagon, or at least appropriate all the most forward-thinking interactive designers as our own.
Jeff Patton posed the following question to the
CodeFreeze audience
If you evaluated the quality of your process based on customer satisfaction, what would that process look like?
Jeff's question helped solidify an approach I have been considering for months. Three influences on my thinking are:
- Google's slogan of Launch Early and Iterate (see my post Launch Early and Learn);
- Eric Ries' concept for startups of a Minimum Viable Product; and
- At CodeFreeze, watching Alan Cooper talk about Interaction Design and watching David Hussman and Jeff Patton talk about Discovery (e.g., Story Mapping).
I have concocted a recipe for a discovery & delivery process that I am eager to share and to take for a test drive.
User-Driven Rapid Prototyping
Lets call it
User-Driven Rapid Prototyping. As the name implies, the approach involves rapid prototyping. It is also user driven because the people who use the application help the software team prioritize the backlog. The challenge and proposed approach are a follows:
Challenge
| Integrating Interactive Design into Agile projects
|
Proposed
Approach
| Iterative Cycles of
- N weeks discovery and
- N weeks coding & delivery
|
The diagram below shows what the iterative cycles of User-Driven Rapid Prototyping might look like
Where
- The hand palming the spiral is a Discovery or Re-Discovery Iteration
- The subsequent handless spirals are Delivery Iterations
- Discovery iterations, after iteration zero, are called Re-Discovery
- Odd iterations are for coding and delivery, while Even iterations are for discovery (interactive research and design).
The software team consists of developers and interaction designers working hand-in-hand. Since the backlog will be now driven by the people using your software, the over-worked and frequently clueless Product Owner we're familiar with from Scrum, becomes redundant.
Iteration zero - Iteration zero is a discovery iteration. The goal is to learn as much as is reasonably possible about the community for which you are developing the product. Iteration zero might include chartering, creating personae, and story mapping. Also it might include any of the groundwork you typically lay before iterating in earnest.
Iteration 1 (and Odd Iterations) - Iteration 1 is the first coding and delivery iteration. Iteration 1 might only include some user feedback screens, or a polling mechanism to enable the people using your application to help the team prioritize features, to call out usability snafus, and to bring to light potential design problems. In general, odd-numbered coding/delivery iterations are for adding new features and releasing a deployable prototype. During coding iterations, developers are coding while the interaction designers are working to stay ahead of the coding/delivery curve with ongoing user research and design deliverables.
Iteration 2 (and Even Iterations) - Iteration 2 is the first re-discovery iteration. The re-discovery iteration is a chance for the interaction designers to account for any feedback, then implement course corrections as needed. During this time, developers work with interaction designers to address the feedback, to re-factor code as needed, and to plan the next delivery.
Designers engage in "designing with your hands" which involves making multiple, low-resolution prototypes quickly
~Tim Brown, CEO of IDEO
There is no one-size-fits-all software process. There are conditions that are likely more amenable to the approach proposed here.
Greenfield software projects and
startup projects might be most suitable. For example, in the evolution of a startup, an ever-improving prototype might be used to attract rounds of investment to fuel continued development phases.
Wouldn't it be a kick if the picture below could just as easily be the people
using your software as the people
crafting it?
More...
- Tim Brown urges designers to think big in this video on Design Thinking.
- In Usage-Centered User Stories & Story Mapping Part 1 and Part 2, I explain what post-Agilists like Jeff Patton and David Hussman, have been telling the Agile community how we might help teams enrich poorly conceived user stories and how we might better use our iteration zero time for product discovery. That is, how discovery might be improved.
